Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Bava Kamma 126:15

אמר לך מבעי ליה לכדרבי חייא בר אבא אמר רבי יוחנן דאמר רבי חייא בר אבא אמר רבי יוחנן הטוען טענת גנב בפקדון משלם תשלומי כפל טבח ומכר משלם תשלומי ארבעה וחמשה

that one verse deals<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXII, 6. ');"><sup>23</sup></span> with a thief and the other<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXII, 7. ');"><sup>24</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

Q. (1) A made a contract with B and gave him a pledge as security that he would fulfill the contract and said, "If I do not carry out the terms of the contract the pledge shall be yours."
(2) C went surety for A to B promising to pay him a certain amount if A should break the terms of the contract.*That two questions were asked of R. Meir, one regarding security, and another regarding a surety, is seen from the fact that towards the end of this Responsum (in the Pr. 130 version which deals with a pledge) R. Meir uses the phrase וכ׳׳ש ערב לא משתעבד מק׳׳ו המשכון עצמו פטור כ׳׳ש הערב, which seems to indicate that the question was also about a surety. Furthermore, Responsum Cr. 34, gives exactly the same answer as Pr. 130, regarding a surety. Do such transactions fall under the rule of asmakta (אסמכתא)?
A. Both cases fall under the rule of asmakta and are, therefore, not binding.
SOURCES: Cr. 34, Pr. 130; L. 356; Asher, Responsa 108, 27.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse